I think there may be something more universal going on, not specific to Eby/his party (neither of which I favour). I see something similar in the federal Conservative Party, which emails its members daily with all kinds of virulent opponent attacks and, more frequently, high-pressure demands for money (sample subject line: "FINAL WARNING"), but almost nothing about policy, and NEVER anything about how to get involved in your local constituency association or campaign. You can't even look up your own riding on their website (you have to use a search engine to know that such a page exists), and when you find it through Google there's little to nothing on the page anyway. Has a candidate been nominated? If so who? If not, WHY, when an election could be called at any time? Will there be a nominating meeting, or is the leader just going to appoint candidates the day the election is called?
It seems like the parties have largely given up on the ground game, and intend to campaign entirely through promoting the leader through the media, or maybe mostly slagging the enemy in the media. Winning hearts and minds is clearly passé.
At this moment, Oct 27, 4:30 pm, there is still no clear-cut decision about election results, or who will be asked to be government in BC. Regardless of the result, we need citizens to insist on society's interest to be served. Chat GBT produced these problem-solving means. Let's insist on them!
In a political standoff, citizens can advocate for several ground rules to ensure that the common interest is prioritized. Here are some key principles:
1) Respectful Dialogue: Encourage all parties to engage in civil discourse, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on issues.
2) Transparency: Demand transparency in decision-making processes, ensuring that all parties communicate openly about their positions and rationale.
3) Fact-Based Discussions: Insist on the use of credible evidence and data to support arguments, reducing misinformation and fostering informed debate.
4) Inclusivity: Ensure that all voices, especially marginalized ones, are included in discussions to reflect diverse perspectives.
5) Compromise: Promote a culture of compromise, encouraging parties to find common ground rather than rigidly sticking to their positions.
6) Time Limits: Set reasonable time limits for debates and discussions to keep conversations focused and productive.
7) Conflict Resolution Mechanisms: Establish neutral mediation or facilitation to help navigate disagreements and find solutions.
8) Community Engagement: Involve the community in decision-making processes to ensure policies reflect the needs and values of constituents.
By advocating for these ground rules, citizens can help create an environment conducive to cooperation and effective governance, even amidst differing viewpoints.
NDP is the political party that Communist Revolution (marxist.ca) openly calls on all labour unions to endorse, which they obediently did. Years ago I helped with door to door canvasing for the Conservative Party of Canada and we were told not to knock on any doors that had an opponent party's lawn sign. So if you don't want the NDP or Liberals to knock on your door, just sign up to get a lawn sign. Phone calls...well you cracked that code.
I've been in BC visiting family the last few weeks and have been very disheartened by the animosity towards anything and anyone conservative. Even my traditionally conservative family have been spewing the left wing drivel pushed by the msm. It's like they've all forgotten how to think critically.
Sounds like she was a party worker identifying the committed voters for election day get out the vote efforts. They won’t engage because that’s not why they’re calling. She had a long list of phone numbers to get through.
I don't think I got even ONE call from the NDP - have I already fallen off their voters lists? I wasn't sad though. It's super irritating talking to these campaigners but I did that job quite a few times and I
USUALLY DID try to at least talk a bit. However, we were cautioned about this and often advised to refer that person to the MLA candidate who actually answered these calls! Mostly.
I did get a couple of calls from the Cons but the guy couldn't even get his message out (where was his script, lol) so I started asking him some questions about women etc. He freaked out and practically slammed the phone down!
Luckily Rustad did not - he was able to cobble together a few remarks on the subject but it's pretty clear he's no feminist and has a long way to go before understanding the issues with the TQ. We just just have to keep in mind that like all politicians, he's really no hero, he's a man, he's there for the province to make money (or become solvent again?) so he has his priorities which are always the priorities of men.
Yep. Same. They just don't care to ask or listen to what may be of concern to 'diverse' Canadians (that is: ones who don't follow their narrative).
Everyone who disagrees with him is literally Hitler, what an amazing coincidence
Once the decision is in, he will likely resign as leader.
You think Eby will resign? I can only hope.
When a leader loses ground this badly, his own party will certainly be pressuring him to step down. Is there somebody better waiting in the wings?
Yep. Same. They just don't care to ask or listen to what may be of concern to 'diverse' Canadians (that is: ones who don't follow their narrative).
I think there may be something more universal going on, not specific to Eby/his party (neither of which I favour). I see something similar in the federal Conservative Party, which emails its members daily with all kinds of virulent opponent attacks and, more frequently, high-pressure demands for money (sample subject line: "FINAL WARNING"), but almost nothing about policy, and NEVER anything about how to get involved in your local constituency association or campaign. You can't even look up your own riding on their website (you have to use a search engine to know that such a page exists), and when you find it through Google there's little to nothing on the page anyway. Has a candidate been nominated? If so who? If not, WHY, when an election could be called at any time? Will there be a nominating meeting, or is the leader just going to appoint candidates the day the election is called?
It seems like the parties have largely given up on the ground game, and intend to campaign entirely through promoting the leader through the media, or maybe mostly slagging the enemy in the media. Winning hearts and minds is clearly passé.
At this moment, Oct 27, 4:30 pm, there is still no clear-cut decision about election results, or who will be asked to be government in BC. Regardless of the result, we need citizens to insist on society's interest to be served. Chat GBT produced these problem-solving means. Let's insist on them!
In a political standoff, citizens can advocate for several ground rules to ensure that the common interest is prioritized. Here are some key principles:
1) Respectful Dialogue: Encourage all parties to engage in civil discourse, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on issues.
2) Transparency: Demand transparency in decision-making processes, ensuring that all parties communicate openly about their positions and rationale.
3) Fact-Based Discussions: Insist on the use of credible evidence and data to support arguments, reducing misinformation and fostering informed debate.
4) Inclusivity: Ensure that all voices, especially marginalized ones, are included in discussions to reflect diverse perspectives.
5) Compromise: Promote a culture of compromise, encouraging parties to find common ground rather than rigidly sticking to their positions.
6) Time Limits: Set reasonable time limits for debates and discussions to keep conversations focused and productive.
7) Conflict Resolution Mechanisms: Establish neutral mediation or facilitation to help navigate disagreements and find solutions.
8) Community Engagement: Involve the community in decision-making processes to ensure policies reflect the needs and values of constituents.
By advocating for these ground rules, citizens can help create an environment conducive to cooperation and effective governance, even amidst differing viewpoints.
NDP is the political party that Communist Revolution (marxist.ca) openly calls on all labour unions to endorse, which they obediently did. Years ago I helped with door to door canvasing for the Conservative Party of Canada and we were told not to knock on any doors that had an opponent party's lawn sign. So if you don't want the NDP or Liberals to knock on your door, just sign up to get a lawn sign. Phone calls...well you cracked that code.
I've been in BC visiting family the last few weeks and have been very disheartened by the animosity towards anything and anyone conservative. Even my traditionally conservative family have been spewing the left wing drivel pushed by the msm. It's like they've all forgotten how to think critically.
Sounds like she was a party worker identifying the committed voters for election day get out the vote efforts. They won’t engage because that’s not why they’re calling. She had a long list of phone numbers to get through.
I don't think I got even ONE call from the NDP - have I already fallen off their voters lists? I wasn't sad though. It's super irritating talking to these campaigners but I did that job quite a few times and I
USUALLY DID try to at least talk a bit. However, we were cautioned about this and often advised to refer that person to the MLA candidate who actually answered these calls! Mostly.
I did get a couple of calls from the Cons but the guy couldn't even get his message out (where was his script, lol) so I started asking him some questions about women etc. He freaked out and practically slammed the phone down!
Luckily Rustad did not - he was able to cobble together a few remarks on the subject but it's pretty clear he's no feminist and has a long way to go before understanding the issues with the TQ. We just just have to keep in mind that like all politicians, he's really no hero, he's a man, he's there for the province to make money (or become solvent again?) so he has his priorities which are always the priorities of men.
Sure hope he wins!